News deserts and Trinidad and Tobago journalism

Audio: Listen to audio clip.

BitDepth#1304

Trinidad and Tobago occupies an interesting space in the Caribbean archipelago for journalists, with a long history of getting information from a newspaper while also embracing, with significant enthusiasm, the possibilities of broadband-driven digital information delivery.

Over the last ten years, the evolution of journalism in TT has both tracked with and been foreshadowed by developments in larger markets. Tradition delayed shifts in news consumption, giving media managers a valuable buffer between an inevitable future of news immediacy and the tradition of the morning paper.

No major media house in TT took advantage of that opportunity and most ploughed on for years, carving familiar trails into well-furrowed fields.

Now, the harvests are in and they are disappointing across the board.

In Margaret Sullivan's book Ghosting the News: Local Journalism and the Crisis of American Democracy, she examines the growth of “news deserts,” large areas of America that are no longer served by local print newsgathering.

While the three major dailies in TT are billed as national newspapers, they serve the same role that city and town dailies do in major metropoles, delivering focused, regionally-specific news that serves a specific geographic area.

Sullivan warns, "When local news fails, the foundations of democracy weaken. The public, which depends on accurate, factual information in order to make good decisions, suffers."

Journalism also faces increased scrutiny from an audience spoiled for choice who can easily switch to alternative, often intentionally biased, sources that profit from serving as echo chambers for radical points of view.

"The consequences may not always be obvious, but they are insidious," Sullivan writes.

The book offers depressing accounts of the collapse of some of an estimated 1,800 local newspapers which have either closed or disappeared through mergers between 2004 and 2015, and examines the consequences of those losses.

Sullivan's conclusion, after considering studies in the US, Japan and Switzerland, is that: "In places where news breaks down, so does citizenship; where newspaper market share increases, so does political accountability."

Answers to this problem remain scarce, but the solutions are not to be found in digital versions of existing reporting models.

The fundamental questions remain, as Sullivan notes: "How do you capture advertising revenue, convince users to pay for your service, and free yourself from the fickleness and meddling of owners and donors?"

Not surprisingly, she admits, "No business model has been able to fully overcome these conundrums."

In the face of gutted advertising dollars and dramatically reduced revenues from classifieds, news outlets have been offered handouts from foundations created by Craig Newmark of Craigslist, Google and Facebook's Journalism Project.

The architects who dismantled the foundations of modern journalism’s business model.

But that isn't the same as paying for news.

Google and Facebook have demonstrated that they really don't care that much about the news business, just the value of the product they can profit from. Facebook's entire budget for its widely touted journalism funding project is roughly one per cent of one day's profit for the company.

PEN America's study Losing the News (https://bit.ly/3fzKF7e) suggests that one solution is formal philanthropy as a way to patch the broken business model that supported newsgathering for most of the last 200 years while seeking sustainability.

No single solution works for every media house, but what surfaces in Sullivan's reporting is the importance of clarity in meeting these challenges.

That only happens when publishers are clear about the value proposition for their work, and effectively target audiences that are willing to support the cost of important and useful journalism.

Mark Lyndersay is the editor of technewstt.com. An expanded version of this can be found there