Pole of Peace: A case for sculptor’s touch

THE EDITOR: In a world often divided by conflict and discord, symbols of peace hold a profound and essential significance. One such symbol that has the potential to inspire and unite is the Pole of Peace – a monument erected to serve as a powerful testament to our shared humanity.

In this connection, the Diego Martin Rotary Club and burgesses of Diego Martin deserve our commendation for their recent efforts in having such a symbol installed in their community.

The peace pole planted in Diego Martin, however, is simply a painted metal beam. It is imbued with precious little or no aesthetic or cultural value. And while the definition of art has expanded to include various materials, concepts and installations, it would be a stretch to classify this pole as "good" contemporary or modern art given what I’m sure would be its inability to engage viewers in any serious artistic dialogue. Therefore, its ability to serve as an inspirational symbol or “a reminder of the peace the borough deserves” can be questioned.

I would wish to argue that if we are to create a monument in the form of a Pole of Peace that would serve as a beacon of hope and reminder of the universal desire for harmony and understanding, such a creation, as history will show, can be appropriately placed in the hands of an artist – a skilled sculptor to be precise. In this regard, the totem poles carved by the First Nations and Indigenous peoples of North America are exceedingly noteworthy.

A peace pole made by a sculptor, like other works of public art, would carry cultural and symbolic significance, embodying creativity and craftsmanship that a simple metal beam cannot. The sculptor's touch transforms the pole into a unique piece of art, fostering deeper emotional and cultural connections to the idea of peace. This artistic expression can inspire reflection and dialogue, enhancing the pole's role as a meaningful symbol of harmony.

The Pole of Peace would not only be an artistic endeavour but also a statement of our collective yearning for a world where differences are celebrated rather than condemned. Its presence in the public space could encourage mutual respect and highlight the shared values that transcend cultural and national boundaries.

Moreover, such a sculpture could become a focal point for peace-related activities. It can serve as a gathering place for events, ceremonies and educational programmes aimed at promoting non-violence and co-operation. It would offer a tangible representation of our commitment to building a better future, providing a sense of solace and an inspiration to all who encounter it.

For the sculptor, creating a Pole of Peace is an opportunity to contribute to the cultural heritage and attraction of the locale. The piece would not only showcase the sculptor’s artistic talent, but also his/her dedication to a cause that affects us all. By crafting this symbol, the sculptor would be giving form to an ideal that is deeply rooted in the human spirit – the desire for peace.

Indeed, the engagement of the sculptor in this project would reflect the society’s support for and appreciation of its creatives. Only then, I would posit, can the Pole of Peace carry the values that will qualify it as a true monument to unity and hope for a peaceful community.

VEL A LEWIS

heritage specialist/

consultant