Music industry needs incentives

THE EDITOR: The news that customs duty exemptions were extended for firms in the energy, tourism and agriculture sectors, as reported in the Newsday on 16th December 2017 is positive. Like these firms, music producers also require incentives that are focused on stimulating production and development. Since the early 2000’s the creative industries were identified for development as drivers of economic diversification. This resulted in a discussion of the introduction of import duty concessions on music production equipment, but this is yet to materialize.

In its August 2017 publication of Major Investment Incentives in Trinidad and Tobago, the Ministry of Finance outlined existing incentives for the creative industries.

These largely favour the film sector, including import duty concessions on film equipment and not music. Both sectors are similarly circumstanced and therefore this incentive should apply across the board.

Other incentives include tax deductions for sponsors and creators of individual projects which seek to reduce or eliminate taxes due on chargeable profit. The majority of legitimate firms in the music sector are SMEs. With recent increases in compulsory business taxes and the general costs of doing business, it is challenging for these companies.

Without import duty concessions, the existing incentives are good but misplaced as music producers are seldom able to capitalize on these.

Recently, the state entity tasked with development of our music industry outlined some positive steps for showcasing and exporting the country’s top talent.

While I acknowledge that initiatives must be executed in phases, according to the overall strategic plan, the issue of import duty concessions for music firms should be a priority.

We must remember that in the music industry value is created by exploiting copyrights.

The fundamental inputs required for such exploitation along the value chain are quality songs and recordings.

This is correlated to cost-effective availability of high quality production equipment and is a prerequisite to export.

In the United States, producers only pay for their equipment.

They benefit from free shipping as well as no taxes in certain states.

Contrast this with TT, where a music producer must pay the cost of acquisition in scarce US dollars, shipping fees, and up to 39.5 per cent taxes (12.5 per cent VAT, 20 per cent customs duty and possible seven per cent online tax).

This is a significant barrier to entry, impediment to innovation and international competition.

An exemption of customs duty for legitimate music firms will result in a marginal decrease in revenue for the state.

However, if we are really serious about growing the music sector, they can have major long-run benefits.

FARLEY J JOSEPH, Gasparillo