Breaking
Caribbean Airlines hit by phishing attack 2 detained for cocaine worth $1.1 M Man in court for killing Rio Claro fruit vendor Kamla warns top public servants Photos: Labour Day in Fyzabad
N Touch
Wednesday 20 June 2018
follow us
Editorial

Not so massive

All artists — from mas man Peter Minshall to the neighbourhood soca parang side — enjoy the right to freedom of expression, enshrined in our Constitution for the benefit of all. But that right is not absolute, legally or morally, and it comes with an obligation not to harm the welfare of society. In practice, the line between free expression and offensive speech is hard to demarcate, but in the case of Massive Gosine’s song the line has clearly been crossed.

Ribaldry is a common feature of our musical forms, but Rowley Mother Count is crass, stupid, vapid and amounts to nothing more than a personal attack on the private life of a public official.

It is not the first time something like this has happened. Earlier this year, we were equally disconcerted by Chalkdust’s Learn from Arithmetic which was a personal attack on Sat Maharaj under the veneer of the need to abolish child marriage. But Learn from Arithmetic is a sophisticated masterpiece when compared with Gosine’s inane creation.

Just as artists have a right to express themselves, so too do members of the public have a right to criticise and debate. It is a sign of a healthy democracy that many people have their own two cents to offer on this issue.

While criticism is not the same as censorship, in some instances, people are entitled to exercise their right not to support — tacitly or otherwise — material which they deem harmful.

The decision of the organisers of the annual Chutney Soca Monarch competition to bar Gosine’s song might have something to do with the fact that the State provides funding to their event, but that does not negate the fact that they have chosen to take a very public stance on something they oppose.

It is notable the song is not receiving high levels of airplay, a sign that it is not well-supported by right-thinking citizens.

Sometimes public opinion is a more sophisticated barometer of these complex issues than literary analysis.

In response to the latest controversy, Maharaj has called for all “offensive” material to be pulled. Some might say this will lead us down a slippery slope.

However, once it is clear any song violates the public interest it is important that the rules apply to similar songs. Otherwise, we end up with something equally offensive: discrimination.

And that is what’s at the heart of this controversy.

The chutney soca is simply a mirror of the lamentable fact that our society remains divided along the margins of race.

That kind of racism is what has opened the doors to so much that is offensive in not only our songs, but also in our everyday picong.

Comments

Reply to this story

Editorial

Wanted: A border policy

TODAY’S observance of World Refugee Day comes as borders are being re-drawn all over the…

Big leap for construction

THE ANNOUNCEMENT of a new online portal designed to streamline applications for construction permits is…

Work and the World Cup

On Thursday, Stephanie Fingal of the Employers’ Consultative Association warned that “Work has to go…

SporTT blight

LAST WEEK’S removal of Dinath Ramnarine as the chairman of the Sports Company of TT…

Harmony indiversity

RACE and religion have been at the forefront of public discourse particularly in recent weeks.…

After the show of force

AMID CONCERNS over a threat of escalated gang violence in Port-of-Spain, National Security Minister Edmund…